首页> 外文OA文献 >The 'China Model' and the global crisis : from Friedrich List to a Chinese mode of governance?
【2h】

The 'China Model' and the global crisis : from Friedrich List to a Chinese mode of governance?

机译:“中国模式”与全球危机:从弗里德里希·李斯特(Friedrich List)到中国的治理模式?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The global financial crisis reinvigorated ongoing debates over whether China has its own distinct and separate “model” of political economy and/or development. There is much that connects this Chinese model with previous systems of national political economies; partly in terms of specific policy preferences, but also in terms of shared basic conceptions of the distribution of power in the global order. Like these previous systems, China has come to stand as an example of an alternative to following dominant (neo)liberal models of development. In this respect, what the China model is not and what China does not stand for might be more important than what it actually is and what it stands for. However, the idea of a coherent and unique Chinese model has considerable purchase, and is both informed and feeds into considerations of China’s uniqueness and difference from the norms, ideas and philosophies that dominate in the rest of the world.
机译:全球金融危机使有关中国是否拥有自己独特的,独立的政治经济和/或发展“模式”的辩论不断升温。这种中国模式与以前的国家政治经济体系之间有很多联系。一方面是根据具体的政策偏好,另一方面是关于全球秩序中权力分配的基本共识。像以前的这些制度一样,中国已成为替代主流(新)自由主义发展模式的典范。在这方面,中国模式不是什么,中国没有代表什么可能比其实际和它所代表的意义更为重要。但是,建立连贯而独特的中国模式的想法颇受追捧,既有见识,又考虑到了中国的独特性以及与世界其他地区的规范,思想和哲学的差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Breslin, Shaun;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号